It’s a long-standing bug: image:rotatedImage(90) offsets/crops pixels by (-1,-1)… new in SDK 1.12?
Which is extra fun because iirc there’s some optimizations for rotating images 90°!
It’s a long-standing bug: image:rotatedImage(90) offsets/crops pixels by (-1,-1)… new in SDK 1.12?
Which is extra fun because iirc there’s some optimizations for rotating images 90°!